Denniswright Work
Student Name: |
|||
Criterion |
Point Value |
Points Possible |
Points given & instructor comments |
Thread |
|||
All key components of the DB question are answered in a new thread |
10 |
60 |
|
Clear, logical flow to post |
10 |
||
Major points are stated clearly |
10 |
||
Major points are supported by the following: 1. scholarly sources, lecture material or Scripture 2. good examples (pertinent conceptual or personal examples are acceptable), 3. thoughtful analysis (considering assumptions, analyzing implications, comparing/contrasting concepts) |
12 |
||
Spelling, grammar & APA |
12 |
||
Sufficient word count (500 words) |
6 |
||
Replies |
|||
At least 2 interaction posts with classmates (that’s 1 reply posted to each of 2 classmates’ threads) |
8 |
40 (2×20 pts ea) |
|
Appropriate “netiquette” manners (For example, no name calling or labeling another student’s idea a derogatory term, such as “stupid,” “dumb” even when disagreeing) |
8 |
||
Brings clarity to issues being discussed relating issues to Scripture/biblical principles and experience |
8 |
||
Word count sufficient (150) words |
6 |
||
Spelling, grammar & APA |
10 |
Discussion Board Grading Rubric
Total Points: ______/100
Discussion Board Forum Instructions
There will be 5 Discussion Board Forums throughout the course. The topics are based on case studies found in the textbook. You must:
- Answer all of the questions listed in each case study.
- Incorporate 2 scholarly sources in your original threads, using proper APA formatting.
Submit one thread of 500 words
Chapter 3 Case Study – Creating Intelligence Systems in Corrections
1. How can communication be improved in an organization that is structured in a traditional bureaucratic form?
2. How might computerized communication be utilized to improve the effectiveness of communication in a bureaucratic organization?
3. How might computerized communication be ineffective?
Student Name: |
|||
Criterion |
Point Value |
Points Possible |
Points given & instructor comments |
All key components of the question are answered in the paper |
18 |
100 |
|
Clear, logical flow to paper |
18 |
||
Major points are stated clearly |
18 |
||
Major points are supported by the following: 1. lecture material or Scripture 2. good examples (pertinent conceptual or personal examples are acceptable), 3. thoughtful analysis (considering assumptions, analyzing implications, comparing/contrasting concepts) |
20 |
||
Spelling, grammar & APA |
15 |
||
Sufficient length (2.5 pages), & title page |
11 |
Disciplinary Assignment Part 1 Grading Rubric
Total Points: _______/100
Disciplinary Assignment Part 1 Instructions
Instructions:
Since 1963, a series of United States Supreme Court case decisions have clarified that in criminal cases, prosecutors must disclose to the defense evidence favorable to the defendant. This includes information that may be used to impeach the credibility of government witnesses, including law enforcement officers. These decisions mean that police officers who have documented histories of lying in official matters are liabilities to their agencies, and these histories may render them unable to testify credibly.
Part 1: Please write a professional memorandum summarizing the main issues that are involved in the following United States Supreme Court cases. You must have at least 2.5 pages not including your title page.
- Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963)
- Giglio v. United States, 405 U. S. 150 (1972)
- United States v. Agurs, 427 U. S. 97 (1976)